Caffeine-Free Weight Loss

90%
Excellent all-natural choice

The ingredients are great, without superfluous blends or fillers, it’s easy to take, and the price is very affordable. I definitely recommend BPI 24/7 Burn if you’re looking for a no-stimulant weight-loss supplement.

  • Ingredients Quality
  • Safety
  • Ease of Use
  • Price and Availability
StorePriceShippingBuy Now
esupplements.com$19.95FreeBuy Now
bb$19.99$3.99Buy Now
am$20.99$3.99Buy Now

BPI 24/7 Burn is the latest weight-loss capsule from BPI Sports. It’s claimed to promote healthy weight loss, increased energy, and appetite control.

Now, there are a lot of weight-loss products on the market, and I was expecting another run-of-the-mill fat burner. However, BPI has made something different with 24/7 Burn. It’s a zero-caffeine, zero-yohimbine supplement.

It’s no secret that caffeine and yohimbine are hard-hitting weight-loss ingredients, so I was intrigued by a product that doesn’t use either. I decided to take a closer look to see if Burn 24/7 can stand up to the competition.

What’s Inside 24/7 Burn?

CLA Matrix 1 gram

CLA

Conjugated linoleic acid, or CLA, is a key source of vital omega-6 fatty acids, commonly used to support heart health and function. Studies show CLA also improves fat loss by blocking new fat storage, prevent the formation of new body fat. [1]

24/7 Burn also uses other natural sources of omega-6 fatty acids, like safflower and avocado oil.

24/7 Burn Blend 750 mg

Garcinia Cambogia

Garcinia cambogia is a fruit used for numerous traditional medicine practices. Studies show its effective because it contains hydroxycitric acid, or HCA.

HCA boosts fat loss by preventing cravings and reducing appetite. Research has found that moderate doses of HCA significantly improved fat loss. [2]

Caralluma Fimbriata Extract

Another natural plant extract, caralluma fimbriata comes from India, where native tribes use it to curb hunger during long hunts.

Clinical research shows that, much like garcinia, this ingredient boosts weight loss by stopping hunger and cravings. [3]

Green Leaf Tea Extract

Green tea has become a staple in weight-loss supplements, and for good reason. It’s an all-natural, healthy compound that has been shown to significantly improve fat reduction.

24/7 Burn contains high concentrations of the active compounds in green tea: catechins, polyphenols, and EGCG. These compounds have been studied extensively and found to increase weight loss by boosting metabolism, inhibiting fat creation, and shedding water weight. [4]

How Do You Take It?

BPI has opted to keep the dosage simple for 24/7 Burn:
Take three capsules daily on an empty stomach before food, or as directed by a qualified healthcare practioner.

How Much Does It Cost?

24/7 Burn is available from a variety of retailers. Here are the best deals I could find. The retail price is listed as $31.99, but you can get it for under $20.

StorePriceShippingBuy Now
esupplements.com$19.95FreeBuy Now
bb$19.99$3.99Buy Now
am$20.99$3.99Buy Now

eSupplements is obviously the best choice. I’ve bought things there before and always had a good experience.

Pick It Or Pitch It?

I think BPI has hit it out of the park with this product. Making a no-stimulant weight-loss capsule is difficult, but 24/7 Burn is both caffeine-free and highly effective.

The ingredients are great, without superfluous blends or fillers, it’s easy to take, and the price is very affordable. I definitely recommend BPI 24/7 Burn if you’re looking for a no-stimulant weight-loss supplement.

References

[1] Steck SE, et al. “Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation for twelve weeks increases lean body mass in obese humans.” The Journal of Nutrition. 2007 May;137(5):1188-93.

[2] “Garcinia.” WebMD.

[3] Kuriyan R, Raj T, Srinivas SK, et al. Effect of Caralluma Fimbriata extract on appetite, food intake and anthropometry in adult Indian men and women. Appetite 2007;48:338-44

[4] ] P. Chantre, D. Lairon. “Recent findings of green tea extract AR25 (Exolise) and its activity for the treatment of obesity.” Phytomedicine. 2002; 9 (1): 3-8.